In a text stream which is comparable to speech and painful throbbing of the singer of the Cuban revolution, Gérard Bouchard, the first half of the pen which signed the historic sense of a Commission report together with one cut multicultural (sorry, "intercultural"!), the author of "The Quebec nation future or past," the inventor of the "civic nation québécoise," calls on the anvil in its contradictions. All daily newspapers in Quebec are witnesses, as well as birds of the river Mingan Jos Montferrand Bitte up to Tibi. Blame it on Voltaire
Again, the "Quebec-born French-Canadian" (sic) did not understand. And if they do not understand is that the fault lies with the nationalist leaders who erased his report. In referring to French Canadians who refuse such treatment, he writes thus: "we must still admit that this new identity [Franco-Québécois] can not be imposed on anyone. Every citizen has the right, if desired, to retain a reference to its roots and cultivate a sense of belonging or particular identity, parallel to each other and in relationship with her ... "
Here's already a lot. I really wonder if the author is aware of what he wrote in his report. In reading it, I like living on another planet! First, it is wrong to say that it is the nationalist leaders who have produced this result. And it is very little to reduce the extent of the outcry of protest since the Indians (reread Max Gros Louis) were immediately registered against the false report. Since the Métis which we do not even deign to acknowledge the two passages in their denouncing the commission also (re-read my own texts and those of other leaders of Quebec). As thousands of French Canadians who are neither nationalistic nor separatists roundly denounced having been reduced to a subculture of modern Quebec, which have the remote more than the clay pipe and the sash as platitudes.
Must be sealed at this point to imagine that only the Quebec nationalists who have something to lose in this report that is trampling on the first founding of Quebec? To wit, the French Canadians and Metis who still represent nearly 70% of the population of Quebec !
Less Metis should note
In its furious release, the co-author of the report therefore supports the idea that formally "every citizen has the right, if desired, to retain a reference to its roots ... . This one, on behalf of all Métis in which he challenged himself there in the newspapers of the Saguenay, I retain the role of the ensuing debate in our society. As an Aboriginal person (Métis), I totally agree on this point. And I suggest just to French Canadians and Metis people who feel constricted and gummed in the staggering Report, not to lose sight of that quote. That is exactly the foundation of the crisis it brought to a level unmatched since the Durham Report. I think the co-author Bouchard is not quite aware that the grass fire started by him in his writings of the post-referendum is becoming a bush fire where no one does has control, and it will take very little for it extends to the whole forest.
Our man also wondered: "why, following the same logic, would it be wrong to speak of Quebecers of French Canadian, especially for those who hold to this reference? The phrase is perfectly neutral, accurate and fair, and it corresponds to historical reality. " I do not think he understood that it is precisely where the shoe pinches. French Canadians and Métis do not just want this shortening. And it is precisely because this concept neutralizes in a soulless Ethnocultural miasma in which they have no references to their history, their struggles, their hopes and their own identity, they scream at the imposture.
If overflow, as he feared, the supervisor the "civic nation Franco-Quebecois" must understand that there is not all for nothing. And Jean Charest can not only blame him for giving a rod of an apprentice wizard who is still not fucking understand it took the baton from the wrong end ...
akakia
0 comments:
Post a Comment